Social Security & Its 85th Birthday (2020)

with No Comments

Social Security turned 85 years old on August 14, 2020.

Social Security was enacted on August 14, 1935 as part of the New Deal under President Franklin Roosevelt. It was initially intended to solve a 34% nonagricultural unemployment that left older people destitute and unlikely to be hired.

These first participants did not pay into the system. It was the younger workers paying for the older unemployed.

In 1940, there were 159.4 workers paying into the system for every retiree collecting benefits. By 1975, that number had dropped to 3.2. Currently that number has fallen to 2.8 and is expected to fall to 2.2 by 2036.

You can see this graphically in this chart from’s “Fast Facts & Figures about Social Security, 2020” :

One reason Social Security is in trouble is because there are so few workers. When it was first started, there were almost 160 workers supporting every Social Security recipient. Now, there are less than three. Soon, it will be closer to two.

Current payments into the Social Security system are used to pay current beneficiaries. In other words, your Social Security payments paid for your parents’ and grandparents’ Social Security benefits.

Your payments are gone. They have been spent. There is no lock box where your payments have been kept safe.

The program got started this way, funding the elderly who never paid into the system. From that unsustainable beginning, the Social Security program has been behind ever since.

Additionally, many people receive Social Security who never paid into the system. My grandfather died when he was 75. My grandmother received Social Security never having paid into the system from his benefit. She continued to collect for an additional 25 years until age 99 and 1/2.

Originally, Social Security was a 1% deduction from current payrolls. Now, it is a 12.4% tax paid half by the employee and half behind-the-scenes by the employer. Although this cost of employment is paid by the employer, the cost of employment is the same to the employer regardless of who pays it. Without Social Security employees could have an additional 12.4% to fund their own retirement account.

The Social Security amount is collected, and if any excess happens to be generated, it is spent buying U.S. Special Issue Securities. This effectively borrows from the Social Security trust fund to finance the deficit. This process is so old and ingrained in our government that no one questions it. This self-dealing by the government would be illegal in a retirement plan. Additionally, most investors know better than to invest their long-term retirement in such investments. Why would you invest your long-term retirement program in low-paying government bonds?

If even one half of Social Security were privatized and invested in the markets, it would fund our retirements better than Social Security’s investment in US Special Issue Securities. Minority men, who have shorter lifespans and therefore collect less of their Social Security benefits, would be able to leave a concrete legacy for their families. This is why I favor privatizing it for those going forward. I would even be willing to give up my Social Security benefit entirely if only the government would allow my children and grandchildren to privatize their own contributions. Yes, there are other ways of shoring up Social Security, but none solve the root problem of incentives.

Even though you paid into Social Security for years, there is no question about if you are going to receive your contributions back; you are not going to. Your contributions were spent decades ago. The only question that remains is: Is the government going to impoverish the next generation as well?

Everyone has in their ancestry at least two parents and four grandparents. You can imagine them as the six people who received what you paid. Your contributions went to your family. Every day, we voters and the government have the chance to free our children from this burden.

Denying yourself the benefits does not liberate our children. The only way to stop the cycle is to eliminate the payroll tax. By removing the payroll tax, we liberate our children from having to give us this gift. Not collecting our benefits is only refusing to open the gift our children are gifting.

I am turning 60 this year. Over the next decade will come the optimum time for me to file for Social Security.

As long as Social Security remains a burden on future generations, I plan on filing for my share. After taking the money, I plan on saving it for or gifting it to my grandchildren as I imagine they are going to need it.

Photo by Claudio Schwarz on Unsplash

Follow David John Marotta:

President, CFP®, AIF®, AAMS®

David John Marotta is the Founder and President of Marotta Wealth Management. He played for the State Department chess team at age 11, graduated from Stanford, taught Computer and Information Science, and still loves math and strategy games. In addition to his financial writing, David is a co-author of The Haunting of Bob Cratchit.