PRISM Would Have Jailed Thomas Jefferson Long Before 1773

with 2 Comments

PRISM Would Have Jailed Thomas Jefferson Long Before 1773

Edward Snowden, a former technical contractor for the National Security Agency (NSA) and employee of the CIA, leaked to the London press details of the massive clandestine surveillance and data collection within the United States. Snowden has now been charged with espionage. Most of us have not missed the irony of this accusation.

One of the leaked programs, PRISM, appears to work with trusted companies to collect as many facets of private communication as it can.

In June, London’s The Guardian reported, “A chart prepared by the NSA, contained within the top-secret document obtained by the Guardian, underscores the breadth of the data it is able to obtain: email, video and voice chat, videos, photos, voice-over-IP (Skype, for example) chats, file transfers, social networking details, and more.”

Internet communications take the cheapest route, not the most direct route physically. With a little government subsidy of electronic infrastructure, we can keep our route inexpensive and eavesdrop on the world.

Furthermore, when you talk on a cell phone, the sounds are already being encoded. Storing them is easy. The government can either compel the company or pay generously for it to store the information and keep quiet.

If the government listens in on these conversations, they are wiretapping without a court order, which is illegal. But by paying the companies to store the conversations indefinitely, the government can wait. If anyone arouses suspicions, government officials can get a court order for a retroactive wiretap. Then they can request or seize the last decade of their suspect’s conversations. All electronic information can be stored and used this way.

All this being said, the NSA is technically forbidden to spy on U.S. citizens. But just as the government can use extradition to deliver someone to a country that can torture, evidence suggests that the NSA may be outsourcing the actual spying and monitoring to another country’s espionage system.

For example, AT&T uses Narus, an Israeli company, to process all of their tapped information. The phone call could be processed in Israel where they are not subject to U.S. law. Transcriptions are then given back to the NSA in an intelligence-sharing operation.

This doesn’t sound like the “circumscribed, narrow system” President Obama claims it is. Rather it is the largest dragnet of privacy violation in history.

A growing stash of surveillance recordings coupled with more laws and regulations means anyone can be selectively targeted and arrested. If such surveillance and technology were common in the time of our Founding Fathers, members of the Committees of Correspondence like Thomas Jefferson or Samuel Adams would have certainly died in drone strikes or been incarcerated in British prisons before they’d even had a chance to dream about creating a new country.

It is painful to imagine what our own government might have done with such power during the civil rights movement or even the Cold War’s Red scares. This surveillance is based entirely on stereotyping and prejudices. Combine that with the power of the federal government, and it’s easy to imagine that many otherwise law-abiding Americans would have been incarcerated or killed had the federal government had the power at the time to target and hunt down its own citizens.

Imagine if everyone’s life was completely recorded how many people could be charged with violations. Many people think their lives so blameless that nothing would be found even if they were followed for a decade. We suspect it wouldn’t even take a week to find something on those we consider to be law-abiding Americans. There are just too many laws.

Connecting to an unsecure Wi-Fi without authorized access, singing “Happy Birthday to You” in public, placing large bets with your friends, failing to pay state use tax, speeding or failing to inform the DMV, IRS, and Selective Service (if male) of an address change are all illegal actions by so-called law-abiding Americans.

In the financial business, the compliance regulations are so onerous that about 70% of SEC examinations find deficiencies of paperwork and procedures. Having a perfect audit report is rare.

Snowden’s motivation for leaking the NSA’s surveillance programs is likely precisely what he has said: “I don’t want to live in a society that does these sorts of things.”

Snowden just told the truth. Now he is charged with espionage. Because he values his liberty, he fled the country.

We have to face the awkward fact that we live in a country where telling the truth about a massive clandestine government surveillance system means being charged with espionage. If Snowden hadn’t been willing to go public, we would still not know what our country was doing with our personal information.

We now know our normally private communications are collected regularly. The American people must respond. If there isn’t a strong enough outcry, these practices will become institutionalized.

Wondering what you can do to Support the Right to Privacy of Correspondence?

Photo by Stephen Melisethian used here under Flickr Creative Commons.

Follow David John Marotta:

President

David John Marotta is the Founder and President of Marotta Wealth Management. He played for the State Department chess team at age 11, graduated from Stanford, taught Computer and Information Science, and still loves math and strategy games. Favorite number: e (2.7182818…)

Follow Megan Russell:

Chief Operating Officer

Megan Russell has worked with Marotta Wealth Management since 2005. She loves to find ways to make the complexities of financial planning accessible to everyone. Her most popular post: The Complete Guide to Your Washing Machine

2 Responses

  1. David John Marotta
    |

    An article by John Hudson on ForeignPolicy.com entitled “Exclusive: After Multiple Denials, CIA Admits to Snooping on Noam Chomsky” included this quote from Noam Chomsky:

    What does Chomsky think? When The Cable presented him with evidence of his CIA file, the famous linguist responded with his trademark cynicism.

    Some day it will be realized that systems of power typically try to extend their power in any way they can think of,” he said. When asked if he was more disturbed by intelligence overreach today (given the latest NSA leaks) or intelligence overreach in the 70s, he dismissed the question as an apples-to-oranges comparison.

    “What was frightening in the ‘60s into early ‘70s was not so much spying as the domestic terror operations, COINTELPRO,” he said, referring to the FBI’s program to discredit and infiltrate domestic political organizations. “And also the lack of interest when they were exposed.”

  2. John Gallagher
    |

    Turns out not only might PRISM have gotten Thomas Jefferson, but the NSA has been surreptitiously weakening international encryption standards and commercial encryption technology for years. These articles describe the other programs that in addition to PRISM are designed to intentionally violate our right to privacy of correspondence. The NSA goes so far as to lump consumers of supposedly-secure commercial encryption technologies in with “other adversaries”. It is time something more than demanding apologies is done to reign this in.